|
|
|
San Sebastian 2004 Session 3-3 |
|
|
<Back to Abstract Home Page> <Previous Page> <Next Page> <Program> |
Is xenon a neuroprotective agent
against acute neuronal injury?
Introduction:
Professor Franks discovered that xenon
potently inhibits the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor non-competitively,
with little effect on GABAA receptors or non-NMDA glutamatergic
receptors.1 Because of the pivotal role which activation of this
receptor subtype plays in the propagation of acute neuronal injury2
we undertook a series of studies to determine whether xenon could act as an
effective neuroprotectant.
Results of Studies:
We used a neuronal-glial co-culture system in which release of the
cytosolic enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), into the culture medium, is
indicative of neuronal injury [1].
We confirmed that the neurones and not the glia were the source of the LDH. In
this system xenon exerts a concentration-dependent neuroprotective effect vs excitotoxicity-induced injury by each
of NMDA and glutamate, with IC50 values of 19%, and 28%,
respectively [1]. Using the same
co-culture model we extended these studies to injury produced by deprivation of
either oxygen alone or oxygen + glucose and showed that xenon is protective
with IC50 values of 10% and 36%, respectively [1,2].
In
an in vivo excitotoxicity model of brain injury in rats, xenon
concentration-dependently reduced neuronal degeneration in the arcuate nucleus
of the hypothalamus, monitored either histologically [1] or immunohistochemically [3],
following subcutaneous administration of the excitotoxin, N-methyl DL-aspartate
(NMA).
We
subsequently extended these studies to assess whether the functional disability
associated with acute neuronal injury could be prevented by xenon [4,5]. Mice were subjected to 60
minutes of right middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) using an intraluminal
filament while receiving either xenon (Group 1) or another putative
neuroprotectant nitrous oxide (N2O; Group 2) or a combination of
xenon and N2O (Group 3). After 24 hours, the mice underwent
functional neurological assessment following which they were sacrificed to
determine cerebral infarct size. Compared to Group 2, the rats in Group 1 had a
significant reduction in total infarct size and displayed significant
improvement in functional outcome on a general neurological deficits scale.
Mice in Group 3 had intermediate values between those in Groups 1 and 2.
Perinatal
cerebral hypoxic-ischaemia remains a frequent cause of chronic neurological
morbidity occurring with a frequency of between 2-4 per 1000 full-term newborn
infants. Various biochemical pathways contribute to the development of
hypoxic-ischaemic (HI) brain injury, including oxygen-free radical formation,
release of excitatory neurotransmitters and consequent elevation of
intracellular calcium, culminating in excitotoxic neuronal death. Because
similar pathogenic mechanisms have been invoked in the development of acute
brain injuries in adults (e.g.,
stroke, and head injury) models of neonatal asphyxia have proven a useful model
system to explore possible therapies for these devastating conditions. Therefore, we implemented an in vivo neonatal rat model of HI.3 In brief, seven-day
old postnatal rat pups underwent right common carotid artery ligation after
which the pups were exposed to 8% oxygen in
either nitrogen or xenon for 90 min at 37°C. On the 7th
day after hypoxia/ischaemia, rats were sacrificed and their brains removed, and
the right hemisphere was separated from the left and weighed. The ratio of the
right hemispheric weight to that of the left (R/L ratio) was deduced and is
akin to “infarct size” for MCAO studies. For each group a cohort of animals was
kept alive for 30 days in order to undergo neuromotor functional assessment
using the methodology described earlier [5].
Xenon prevented the brain shrinkage and functional deficit (Figure 10); this
protective effect was present even when xenon is administered up to four hours after HI. In contrast to other anaesthetics
that require anaesthetic or supra-anaesthetic doses to act as a
neuroprotectant,
xenon exerts
its neuroprotection at sub-anaesthetic concentrations. The neuroprotectant
effect 
is unrelated
to any possible hypothermic action as brain temperatures were unaffected by the
presence of xenon when the animals were kept at an ambient temperature of 37oC.
Although a direct reduction in NMDA-mediated excitotoxicity is a likely mechanism for the neuroprotective action of xenon, inflammation is a known mechanism that modulates both functional and histologic outcome following cerebral injury4. Migration of leukocytes to injured areas is a key inflammatory feature in disease progression within the brain. Leukocyte migration is facilitated by the expression of cell adhesion molecules (AM) on endothelial cells and the ability to change their expression can mitigate disease progression. Xenon (up to 75%) exerted no meaningful change of LPS-induced upregulation of AMs in an in vitro model involving mice brain endothelial cells [6]. We investigated whether xenon can reduce the inflammatory response occurring on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), as reflected by the upregulation of cytokines5. Under the same xenon conditions that produced attenuation of the neurocognitive deficit of CPB, there was no change in the cytokine response [7]. Therefore, we can conclude that xenon does not produce its neuroprotective through an anti-inflammatory action.
Exploring Clinical
Extrapolations:

(i) Despite
successful surgical correction of their cardiac problems, patients often
experience clinically significant postoperative neurocognitive deficits
(PONCD), the long-term consequences of which include a higher mortality rate
and lower quality of life. Up to 50% of patients exhibit signs of cognitive
decline, defined as memory and intellectual impairments in the remote
post-surgical period6. The neurological damage caused by
cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) represents a major
medico-social problem due to increasing prevalence of cardiac surgical
procedures, and because patients may be at a productive vocational stage of
their lives. Their illness burdens both acute and chronic health as well as
social care resources. Although multifactorial in origin, a pivotal step in the
pathogenesis of PONCD following cardiac surgery is thought to be excitotoxicity
initiated by activation of the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor; indeed,
the only successful treatment involved perioperative administration of
remacemide, an NMDA receptor antagonist (although
the clinical development of this compound was abandoned because of a poor
kinetic profile)7.
CPB provides an invaluable testing
ground for neuroprotective agents, both because this clinical setting is an
indication for the use of neuroprotective agents, and because positive data can
be extended to stroke, trauma and perinatal asphyxia – all of which represent
huge burdens for the NHS and society as a whole. Before we undertake such a
study in humans, we first needed to perform functional outcome studies using a
rat cardiopulmonary bypass model of neurological injury [5]. Physiological factors known to affect neurological function
(such as blood pressure, temperature, glucose control etc.), were monitored and maintained within normal limits;
neuromotor skills, visuospatial memory and spatial memory were assessed for up
to 12 days after rats were subjected to CPB in the presence of either xenon or
nitrogen (delivered through an oxygenator in the extracorporeal circuit) at a
concentration of 65%. As a positive control for an NMDA receptor antagonist we
used MK801 (dizolcipine), one of the most potent drugs for neuroprotection8.
Neurocognitive dysfunction following CPB was attenuated by xenon; the
neuroprotection provided by xenon proved to be superior to that seen with
dizolcipine (Figure 11).
(ii) Several
NMDA receptor antagonists that have been shown to be effective in animal models
have had to be abandoned in clinical trials because of their own inherent
neurotoxicity (characterised by a specific lesion in the retrosplenial cortex).
Not only does xenon not share the toxicity attendant on the use of other NMDA
receptor antagonists [3], but it
even protects against the development of the neurotoxicity when co-administered
with other NMDA receptor antagonists9.
(iii) Another important consideration for the clinical application of xenon as a neuroprotectant is the effect that other contemporaneously delivered neuroprotectant strategies may have on its efficacy. Because of the recent data suggesting that hypothermia can be protective against acute neuronal injury in neonatal HI, we undertook a series of studies exploring the interaction between xenon and hypothermia. Cultured neurons injured by oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) were protected by a combination of interventions with xenon (20%) and hypothermia (35oC) which, when administered alone, were not efficacious. The xenon IC50 concentration for the neuroprotection vs OGD-induced injury decreased from 40% at 37oC to just 12% at 33oC (Figure 12). Such a synergistic interaction with hypothermia may be a unique feature of xenon because it is not present with other neuroprotectants with activity at the NMDA receptor such as gavestinel. A combination of xenon and hypothermia administered 4 h after hypoxic-ischemic injury in neonatal rats provided synergistic neuroprotection assessed by morphological criteria, by hemispheric weight, and by neuromotor functional studies 30 days after the injury. In both in vitro and in vivo models, the protective mechanism involved an anti-apoptotic action with increased expression of BclXL, and decreased expression of Bax, important anti- and pro-apoptotic factors, respectively . If extrapolatable to humans, these data suggest that low (subanesthetic) concentrations of xenon in combination with mild hypothermia may provide a safe and effective therapy for perinatal asphyxia.
References from our Laboratory
[1]
Wilhelm S, Ma D, Maze M,
Franks NP. Effects of xenon on in vitro
and in vivo models of neuronal
injury. Anesthesiology
2002;96:1485-91.
[2]
Ma D, Hossain M,
Rajakumaraswamy N, Franks NP, Maze M. Combination of xenon and isoflurane
produces a synergistic protective effect against oxygen-glucose deprivation
injury in a neuronal-glial co-culture model. Anesthesiology 2003;99:748-51.
[3]
Ma D, Wilhelm S, Maze M,
Franks NP. Neuroprotective and neurotoxic properties of the 'inert' gas, xenon.
Br. J. Anaesth. 2002;89:739-46.
[4]
Homi HM, Yokoo N, Ma D,
Warner DS, Franks NP, Maze M, Grocott HP. The neuroprotective effect of xenon
administration during transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Anesthesiology 2003;99:876-81.
[5]
Ma D, Yang H, Lynch J,
Franks NP, Maze M, Grocott HP. Xenon attenuates cardiopulmonary bypass-induced
neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction in the rat. Anesthesiology 2003;98:690-8.
[6]
Yamamoto H, Takata M, Marczin N, Franks
NP, Maze M Xenon`s Effect on Adhesion Molecule Expression in Inflammation Model
of Mouse Brain Endothelial Cell. A-477 2003 ASA Meeting Abstracts.
[7]
Clark JA, Ma D, Homi HH, Mathew JP,
Maze M, Grocott HP. Xenon and the Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass in the Rat Anaesthesia. Submitted to Anesthesiology.
Other references
1. de Sousa SL, Dickinson R, Lieb WR, Franks NP. Contrasting synaptic actions of the inhalational general anesthetics isoflurane and xenon. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1055-66.
2. Nicotera and Lipton J. Excitotoxins in neuronal apoptosis and necrosis. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:583-91.
3. Rice III JE, Vannucci RC, Brierley JB. The influence of immaturity on hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in rats. Ann. Neurol. 1981;9:131-41.
4. del Zoppo G, Ginis I, Hallenbeck JM et al. Inflammation and stroke: putative role for cytokines, adhesion molecules and iNOS in brain response to ischemia. Brain Pathol 2000;10:95-112.
5. Wan S, Marchant A, DeSmet JM et al. Human cytokine responses to cardiac transplantation and coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:469-77.
6. Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, Laskowitz DT, Mark DB, Blumenthal JA. Neurologic Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Research Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke Heart Center. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke 2001;32:2874-81.
7. Arrowsmith JE, Harrison MJ, Newman SP, Stygall J, Timberlake N, Pugsley WB. Neuroprotection of the brain during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized trial of remacemide during coronary artery bypass in 171 patients. Stroke 1998;29:2357-62
8.
Levene
M. Role of excitatory amino acid antagonists in the management of birth
asphyxia. Biol. Neonate
1992;62:248-51.
9.
Nagata A, Nakao Si S, Nishizawa N, Masuzawa M,
Inada T, Murao K, et al. Xenon
inhibits but N2O enhances ketamine-induced c-Fos expression in the
rat posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortices. Anesth. Analg. 2001; 92: 362-8.